The University of Michigan Biological Station (UMBS) was founded in 1909.
Great lakes double-crested cormorant management affects co-nester colony growth
Title | Great lakes double-crested cormorant management affects co-nester colony growth |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2018 |
Authors | Wyman KE, Wires LR, Cuthbert FJ |
Journal | The Journal of Wildlife Management |
Volume | 8217284698719535715636198275835291410371453430965182836323840 |
Pagination | 93 - 102 |
Date Published | Jan-01-2018 |
Keywords | Ardea herodias, culling, double-crested cormorant, Larus argentatus, Larus delawarensis, North American Great Lakes, Nycticorax nycticorax, Phalacrocorax auritus, population growth |
Abstract | The population of double-crested cormorants (Phalacorocorax auritus; cormorants) in the North American Great Lakes has increased substantially since the 1970s, sparking economic, social, and biological concerns that have led to widespread management of the species within United States waters. Previous studies have quantified behavioral impacts of cormorants on other waterbird species that share breeding colony sites with cormorants. However, no study has yet examined how these impacts might scale to entire colonies, nor have potential effects of cormorant management on co-nesters been examined. Our objective was to estimate effects of cormorant abundance and management on colony growth indices of 4 species that commonly co-nest with cormorants in the North American Great Lakes; 3 of these species are conservation or stewardship priorities for the region. We estimated colony growth using the Great Lakes Colonial Waterbird Survey and comparable Canadian surveys, conducted between 1976 and 2010. We then applied linear mixed models to determine association of co-nester colony growth indices with cormorant abundance and management presence and intensity while controlling for other factors that likely influenced growth rates. According to the fitted models, black-crowned night-heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) colony growth was negatively related to cormorant abundance and management, whereas great blue herons (Ardea herodias) had little response to cormorant abundance, and herring gulls (Larus argentatus) and ring-billed gulls (Larus delawarensis) responded positively to cormorant abundance and management. These results suggest that cormorant management may not be as neutral to co-nesters as is often assumed. Responsible management plans for cormorants should take into account the likely effects on co-nesters present so that conservation and management goals for co-nesters can also be met. 2017 The Wildlife Society. |
URL | http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jwmg.21343http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/jwmg.21343/fullpdfhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjwmg.21343 |
DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.21343 |